Research Workflow
- Identify the current product and seller.
- Separate seller claims from independent evidence.
- Map each claim to the closest available evidence.
- Check safety, pricing and refund terms separately.
- Audit internal consistency before publication.
Source Hierarchy for Scientific Claims
Primary research and systematic reviews are preferred for clinical questions; FDA and other regulatory sources are preferred for regulatory facts.
Claim Tags
We distinguish product fact, seller claim, ingredient evidence and editorial inference.
Evidence Escalation Audit
We specifically check whether wording accidentally upgrades ingredient plausibility into finished-product proof.
Zero-Trust Review
Affiliate content, copied testimonials and unsupported percentages are not accepted as independent evidence.
Page-Level Intent Check
Before publication, each URL is assigned one primary reader intent. Price, safety, complaints, ingredients, effectiveness, comparisons, and educational guides are kept distinct so that pages add unique value instead of repeating the homepage with slightly different keywords.
Commercial-Fact Verification
Prices, package sizes, guarantees, and seller terms are treated as time-sensitive commercial facts. We date them, prefer the seller or manufacturer as the primary source for those facts, and avoid presenting a past promotion as a permanent offer.
Update and Correction Standard
When a material fact changes, the affected page should be updated rather than silently leaving an obsolete statement in place. Corrections should preserve the distinction between what the seller claims, what an independent source establishes, and what remains uncertain.
Sources & References
See our sources policy and editorial methodology.
Related Research
Editorial owner: DentaBiome Reviews Editorial Team · Last reviewed: October 1, 2026